It's Time To Kill Performance Reviews. Here's Why!
Liz Ryan

It's Time To Kill Performance Reviews. Here's Why!

One thing we learn in life is that some of our most important lessons come to us slowly.

We don't get every big "Aha!" all at once in a flash of insight. Sometimes the learning drips in slowly, instead.

That's what happened with me with respect to performance reviews. I created the annual performance review at several companies I worked for. I helped other HR people create their performance review systems, too.

I looked at dozens of formats and perspectives surrounding the performance review process. I reworked our company's process slightly every year to make it better - or at least that's what I was trying to do.

A little voice in the back of my brain nagged at me: "Despite your efforts to make them more compassionate and less uncomfortable for everyone, performance reviews are stupid from the get-go, Liz!

"How does one human being get to evaluate another one, when their personalities and perspectives may be radically different?

"Why would we sit down and talk about the whole past year, especially from the perspective 'How well did you do your job in the past 12 months?' What a time-waster and mojo-killer!"

I had doubts, but I still administered performance-review and performance-management systems and of course, I wrote scores of performance reviews myself.

I sat through dozens of performance-review meetings -- meetings where my boss reviewed my past year's performance, and meetings where I talked with my team members about their past year's results. Here's what I noticed.

When my boss and I were in synch, the performance review meeting was pointless, because it was well-covered ground already.

When my manager and I were out of synch, the performance-review conversation was pointless again, because I didn't value my manager's advice and had no intention of following it. 

Now I can see clearly that performance reviews are not only a massive waste of time and energy, but damaging to the the fabric of a healthy corporate culture as well.

What do teams run on? They run on their collective momentum and trust. At Human Workplace we call that power source Team Mojo. Performance reviews, no matter how they are executed, can only deplete your Team Mojo.

They come from a place of fear -- fear that you might have screwed something up during the year and will be called to task for it.

Managers are afraid of giving calm and supportive performance reviews in case they're accused of being too "soft" on their employees, as though the hard-soft continuum were relevant to leading and managing capable adults.

There is no benefit to looking back over the past year and asking a working person "How well did you perform?" much less in telling him or her "Here's how I think you performed!"

If we are going to get better at what we do individually and in groups, we have to talk about situations we're dealing with when they arise, not months later!

We have to talk about them from the vantage point "What can we learn?" versus the perspective "Have you been a good or bad little elf this year?"

It is an act of power, not of trust, to call an employee into a conference room and review the past 12 months with the question"How well did you perform your job this year?" hanging over the conversation.

People who are immersed in their work don't invest enormous amounts of energy to get a gold star or to kiss their manager's rear end.

They throw themselves into their work because their work speaks to them. That's why evaluating their work from the standpoint "Are you an Excellent, Good or just Average employee?" is demeaning and insulting.

Talk about killing the goose that lays the golden eggs! When we presume to break the sacred connection between people and their work -- work that speaks to them and connects them with their power source -- we are behaving stupidly.

If we were tuned into the human channel at work -- the channel that broadcasts fear and trust signals -- we would see why performance reviews are so damaging to individuals and to teams.

Sadly, in the business and professional worlds we have trained ourselves not to notice the waves of fear and trust swirling around us.

That is a shame, because we'd be much happier and healthier and our organizations would be more profitable if we saw the waves and talked about them. 

We have constructed our crusty, archaic performance review systems to give employees our feedback whether they want it or not, because we believe that our feedback is good for them -- whether they value it or not! 

Without a bond of trust, even your most thoughtful coaching won't have any impact, but the problem posed by performance reviews is worse than that.

By reinforcing the idea that managers by virtue of their positions naturally and inevitably know more about how the work should be done than their underlings do, formal performance review systems reinforce everything that is broken about work.

Employment lawyers told me for years that a formal performance review process was a critical element in a leadership program. They told me that if we wanted to terminate an employee, the written record in the performance review would protect us against any claims.

That turned out to be false. In the U.S. we have the Employment at Will doctrine in place. It protects employers against claims from terminated employees far better than anybody's performance-review notes will.

Employment at Will says that your employer can send you packing because they feel like it. They don't need a reason to dismiss you, as long as they don't discriminate.

Every single time I had a manager say "I need to fire Shirley" and I pulled up Shirley's last performance review to read it, that very same manager had noted during Shirley's annual review that Shirley's performance was average.

I'd ask the manager why Shirley's performance was average a mere three months ago but now Shirley must be fired, and s/he'd say "Shirley's performance was lousy back then too, but I was trying to motivate her."

We need a way to figure out how to pay our employees each year, but trying to peg their new year's pay to their last year's results in the job is idiotic and insulting. 

There are many factors that go into a person's job performance and many of them don't make themselves evident right away.

We are not machines whose output can be easily counted and sorted, especially in the moment. One person is a weaker bean-counter than another but holds the team together as the unofficial cheerleader and den leader.

Another person is a lousy note-taker and needs help with followup but is an incredible genius at problem-solving.

Real life and real work don't fit into our arbitrary categories or fit conveniently into one spot on the Poor-Fair-Average-Above Average-Excellent spectrum.

Our job as leaders is to inspire our teams and remove roadblocks from our team members' paths. We can get rid of a massive energetic roadblock by removing  performance review systems.

In a Human Workplace environment that values people beyond their daily output, your brilliant team members bring themselves completely to work, heart and soul. That's a good thing! You want them focused on the big win for the company and for themselves, not a list of goals posted on a chart on the wall.

Slowly employers are realizing that they've wasted precious time, money and energy in their faulty recruiting systems. When they ask us "What's the next piece of the Godzilla structure to dismantle, once we've humanized our recruiting process?" we say "Kill performance reviews!"

The time and energy savings available to employers who toss annual performance reviews in the dustbin where they belong are enormous, but in order to overcome our addiction to measuring our teammates' output, we have to trust ourselves to lead through trust rather than to manage through fear.

Here's how Brendan, an HR VP, got the message that his company's performance review system had to go? He told us this story:

"I was talking with Blair, a manager in our company who hates to write and deliver performance reviews. Blair asked me 'Why do I have to sit down and talk with Kathy about her progress once a year, or once a quarter?

"Kathy and I talk every day. If I didn't talk to Kathy way more often than the performance review process requires me to, I wouldn't be a good manager. If I'm not a good manager, no performance review process will make me one.'

"I listened to Blair and it hit me like a ton of bricks. Performance reviews are a waste of time!"

If you're on the fence about nuking your performance review process, ask your employees what they think. Anybody who wants feedback from his or her manager should surely be able to get it.

Some of your teammates might love a steady stream of coaching suggestions, and they are entitled to them. Other folks might pass on your kind offer to critique their work, and that's their privilege, too. If a major issue were to arise, you'd address it then and there.

You can trust your teammates to manage their work, can't you? I hope so - you hired them! You trust yourself to hire adults and treat them as adults, right?

Of course you do!

Our company is called Human Workplace. Our mission is to reinvent work for people.

If you're thinking about your job or your or job search in 2016, check out these virtual courses starting November 7th, 2015 (or available for immediate delivery if you're in fast-forward mode!):

  • Jump-Start Your 2016 Plan -- construct your 2016 life and career plan and launch it in this visioning and planning course!
  • Get Ahead! -- take control of your job and expand your possibilities!
  • Get the Job You Deserve -- learn the Human Workplace non-traditional job search approach including Pain Letters and your Human-Voiced Resume, and get the job you deserve!
  • Launch Your Consulting Business -- plan and launch your own part-time or full-time consulting business in this comprehensive course!

If you are an HR person or organization leader looking with a fresh eye at your performance appraisal and performance-management system, contact us here to learn about our Ten Steps to Your Healthiest Culture program that will take you from wherever you are now on your organization's cultural journey to the next big step up!

 

 

Shari Cooper

CHRL & Human Resources Director, Hillel Lodge Long-term Care Home

2y

“Without a bond of trust, even your most thoughtful coaching won't have any impact”. One of several well-made points.

Like
Reply
K'Lin N.

University of Texas at Tyler

6y

Three years into a job at a start up, my responsibilities have grown exponentially, as has my breadth of knowledge of the industry and experience in highly technical systems. I have basically invented my niche in the company from scratch. I have not had a performance review in all this time, nor have I been offered a raise. This summer, the new HR director (hired a few months ago) has decided to do performance reviews and tie them to raises. It seems crazy to me that someone who has no clue about what I do or why, has never talked with me about what I do or why, and has verbally misstated what I do in front of people could adequately review my performance. Mojo killer for sure.

Alan Turner

Business Owner, Entrepreneur & Investor

7y

I have to agree with Liz. The performance review process I have found in my experience is mostly a check box exercise. There is a deadline to have it completed, no questions around the actual value of the process, just as long as it has been completed then the company is happy. It changed every year too, and every year HO came up with new and wonderful ways that we could review our employee's performance, however, most intelligent people I know couldn't even understand the form properly anyway so it never got completed correctly and basically ended up as a rating of poor, average or good. The thing is, I saw my staff every day and spoke to them every day, how they were doing, how they had responded to various problems and how they had solved those problems during the day, we had our bad days obviously but for the most part the team performed well and the department functioned extremely well. The thing that was really irritating to me is that I saw my manager once or twice a year, and one of those times he would do my performance review, again a check box exercise that actually meant very little!

Like
Reply
Ollie Meyers

Director, Technology at Hunt Real Estate Capital

8y

This is a fantastic article! "Leading through trust rather than managing from fear" should be the mantra of every organization and anyone in a position of leading people.

Like
Reply
Torsten Eg Nørgaard

In retirement from May 2020

8y

Enjoyed the reading. Do you assume that maintaining this mountain of "useless" and even counterproductive procedure has been generally accepted because it shows on the surface that the company is well structured and systematic in handling its most precious assets, its people?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics